Filters
Question type

Study Flashcards

What type of endorsement did Susan make on the back of the check?


A) A special endorsement.
B) A special qualified endorsement.
C) A blank endorsement.
D) A blank qualified endorsement.
E) An ineffective endorsement because the words "without recourse" have no effect.

F) B) and E)
G) B) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In the process of negotiation,what is meant by the term "delivery"?


A) The physical handing of an instrument from someone entitled to it to the person intended to receive it.
B) The passing of a warranty that the instrument is collectible.
C) The passing of a warranty that an instrument qualifies as a negotiable instrument.
D) The passing of a warranty that the recipient is a holder.
E) The passing of a warranty that the recipient is a holder in due course.

F) All of the above
G) D) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In Russia a transaction involving a promissory note is a legitimate documentary transaction.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is an instrument payable to a specific,named payee?


A) A bearer instrument.
B) A delivery instrument.
C) An order instrument.
D) A transfer instrument.
E) An acknowledgement instrument.

F) A) and E)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Helen worked for ABC Company as the company treasurer.She took 20 of ABC Company's checks,labeled as belonging to ABC Company.Over the course of one year,she signed and mailed the checks to American Express,her own credit card company,to pay her own credit card debt.Assuming the court follows the case in the text,Watson Coatings Inc.,v.American Express Travel Services Inc.,which of the following is the most likely result in a lawsuit by ABC Company against American Express to recover the amounts of the checks?


A) ABC Company will prevail because American Express, as a payee, does not qualify as a holder in due course.
B) ABC Company will prevail because American Express should have realized that fraud was involved from the fact that the checks were ABC Company checks.
C) ABC Company will prevail because fraud was involved.
D) American Express will prevail and will not be required to return funds.
E) American Express will have to return ½ of the funds because the parties were equally at fault, American Express for taking the checks, and ABC Company for not more carefully supervising its employee.

F) B) and D)
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Which of the following is a party who is in possession of an instrument that is payable to the party or to the bearer of the instrument?


A) A holder.
B) A bearer.
C) A payee.
D) An issuer.
E) A transferee.

F) A) and B)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A bank has given value for a negotiable instrument to the extent that the bank has a security interest in the instrument.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Once an instrument is negotiable,it remains negotiable.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

What is the effect of Susan receiving notice the day after she cashed the check for Bob that the check had been stolen?


A) The notice has no effect on her status as holder in due course because it was provided after she cashed the check.
B) The notice prevents her from being a holder in due course.
C) The notice prevents her from being a holder in due course only if Bob had been convicted of check cashing offenses in the past since she should have checked his criminal record.
D) The notice prevents her from being a holder in due course only if she subjectively knew that Bob had been charged criminally with check cashing violations in the past.
E) The notice prevents her from being a holder in due course because it was presented to a business; only individuals can avoid the effect of notice of theft by cashing a check prior to receiving notice.

F) B) and D)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 61 - 69 of 69

Related Exams

Show Answer